Given the lack of specific, convincing reasons that Rector Helen Dragas has given for forcing the resignation of UVA President Teresa Sullivan, what really motivated the decision has become a mystery. What if a visceral, even unconscious, prejudice against Sullivan’s physical appearance, manner, or gender contributed to the undignified way in which her firing was handled?
• Dragas to Kington: ‘Why we can’t afford to wait’
• Resignations begin: Esteemed computer science prof pulls plug
• Kaine’s take: BOV secrecy a ‘huge mistake’
“The problem here,” says UVA Faculty Senate chair George Cohen, “is I haven’t seen any evidence that President Sullivan wasn’t capable of addressing the University’s challenges or problems.”
UVA’s Larry Sabato has called the process leading up to the decision “absolutely outrageous.”
“There wasn’t a scintilla of transparency in it,” he told Richmond Station NBC12 in a rare interview. “This has given us the worst two weeks of publicity since I’ve been associated with the University, and that was 42 years ago. I’m sick at heart.”
Sabato likened the ouster to a military “command and control” operation, and said that the only cure for the blunder was to reinstate President Sullivan.
For many, however, the question remains: What on earth were Dragas and company thinking? According to one source, Dragas assured UVA Provost John Simon that the fall-out from the firing would blow over in a “couple of days.” What might have lead to such short-sighted, foolish thinking? READ MORE
Leave a Reply